How did the Dividers Fail?
Ziad Amine ponders over the reasons for the current failure of the imperialist war lobbies’ plot to divide the Middle-East.
Kuwait’s Summit and the Renitency Victory
There are many doubts about the Kuwait summit, as there is much conflict within its political approach.
Until yesterday, most of the city’s summit was following the rules of the US constitution and its followers to give birth to the new middle East, which was promised by Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of State during George Bush’s presidency. Her plan is to divide the region’s cities in order to dominate all their resources and keep them in an ignorant and helpless state. This can ensure the existence and continuation of Zionism, keeping it alive and safe.
Many systems and governments collapsed as some of them thought that they are growing and succeeding . But finally, they were surprised when there were so close to the mine fields. That would mean Syria, its people and its army. Syria, the bacillus who refuses falling down and to kneel.
They rally all their investigator’s possibilities as political and media-related. We must not forget the army and the financial possibilities, and where they recruit the world’s mercenaries and its terrorists to the land of resistance, spreading every sort of misdeed.
But they didn’t recognize that they are failing. Here come the questions: Are the decisions fair enough for the Syrian people who have been living a tragedy for three years? Is it a coma? Or do the Arab leaders finally have an awakened conscience?
Maybe it is to protect Syria and the safety of its land, or perhaps an Arab desire to reconcile with the Syrian system which was oppressed by the whole world for a long time?
The follower of these political issues can recognize that the last instructions have altered Kuwait’s summit decisions .
So, what are the real reasons that pushed the Arab leaders to change their political attitude and take a moderate stance which comforts Syria?
First, the main reasons which confused the international plans are the steadfastness of the Syrian leadership against the American Zionist plan, the support the Syrian leadership from its people and the stability of the Syrian country and its institutions. So the American and Zionist countries are trying to adopt a new strategy and tactic. Perhaps it will help them reduce their failures.
Second, the support of the Lebanese resistance to the Syria from the beginning was a confirmation of the failure of the war in July, 2006. Reaching the end against the expiatory and terrorists has shown us the liberation of al-Qusayr, al-Qalamoun and other borderlands between Lebanon and Syria.
Third, the firmness of the Iranian position to support their ally and to give all the possible support to the Syrian government, its people and its army.
Fourth, the Russian position which also supports Syria to find the right political solution to fight terrorism.
Fifth, the success of the Islamic Jihad and other Palestinian resistance in breaking the silence and starting a new way to fight Zionism. Whether at a third new Palestinian revolution or by a new resistance.
Sixth, the American administration and its tools have failed to change the situation in Syria. And that is due to the internal fighting between the terrorist rebels over the control of potential sources. That cause has pushed the USA and its tools to undo support and to fight them instead.
Finally, the American Zionist countries felt that their instruments are not sufficient enough and has become onus on them. This is why the Arab’s move to fight terrorism was clear.
All these reasons have developed a new Arab attitude in dealing with the Syrian crisis. This shows the failure of the project. On the other hand, the Renitency victory than can be added to the victories in Lebanon and Palestine.